EndoTODAY | EndoATLAS | Outpatient Clinic

Parasite | Esophagus | Stomach | Cancer | ESD

Home | Guide | Author | Search | Blog | Links


[Editorial office에서 사용하는 표현 모음]

Thanks for your invitation. I would be happy to review the revised version whenever it is available, but please give me at least 2-3 months of interval for the next new invitation unrelated to this manuscript.

Your manuscript, "___ " has been evaluated by the editors of the journal. With regret, I must inform you that after an initial evaluation by two members of the editorial board, I have decided that your paper cannot be considered further for publication in _____. I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication. We hope you will continue to submit papers to ___.

With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in ___. Below, please find the comments for your perusal. You are kindly requested to also check the website for possible reviewer attachment(s). I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication.

With regret, I must inform you that after an initial evaluation by two members of the editorial board, I have decided that your paper cannot be considered further for publication in _____. I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication. We hope you will continue to submit papers to ____.


The Editors have considered your paper ___ in the light of referee comments. We regret that we are unable to accept the article in its present form; some of the reasons for this decision are outlined in the attached referee comments.

In addition to the referee comments, please ensure the following editorial comments are attended to:

1. please do not use personal pronouns (we, our etc. etc.)
2. Do not report numbers in the methods section, Before the start of the study you did not know you would end up with a certain number of patients using selection criteria for the identification of the study subjets. Move this part to the beginning of the results section.
3. please condense the results section by not repeating all data form the tables in the text.
4. shorten the discussion by 25%

Please mark all your changes using bold text.


[Editor kick]

We regert to inform you that your manuscript entitled "___" was not accepted for publication in Digestive Endoscopy. The manuscript was assessed by an associate editor and the Board of Editors. While this manuscript was well written, it scored low on priority for publication in the journal given increasing competition for space.

We receive far more manuscripts than our reviewers can handle and must reject some papers without formal review based on the priority for publication. We do appreciated our thoughtfulness in submitting your manuscript to the journal for publication.


[Revision]

Your manuscript was evaluated by two reviewers in this field and our editorial team. As you can see from the reviewers' comments at the foot of this letter, revision was recommended.

An associate editor would also ask you to reponsed the following point to ensure that it is considered in your revised version.

1. In some situations, small duodenal SMT can be followed with endoscopy only. Would you add some comments on the indication of EUS of EUS-FNA for small duodenal SMTs.

© 일원내시경교실 바른내시경연구소 이준행. EndoTODAY Endoscopy Learning Center. Lee Jun Haeng.