EndoTODAY | EndoATLAS | OPD

Parasite | Eso | Sto | Cancer | ESD

Boxim | DEX | Sono | Schedule

Home | Recent | Blog | Links

EndoTODAY ³»½Ã°æ ±³½Ç


[À§¸Åµ¶. Gastric syphilis] - ðû

1. À§¸Åµ¶ÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû Ư¡ Clinical features of gastric syphilis

2. À§¸Åµ¶ÀÇ ³»½Ã°æ ¼Ò°ß Endoscopic findings of gastric syphilis

3. CPC case

4. More cases

5. Rectal syphilis

6. References

ÃÖ±Ù À§¸Åµ¶(gastric syphilis)ÀÌ Á¶±Ý¾¿ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °Í °°´Ù´Â ÀÇ°ßÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î ¸Åµ¶ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î À§¸Åµ¶µµ µû¶ó¼­ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °Í ¾Æ´Ò±î ½Í½À´Ï´Ù. ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó¿¡¼­ ¸Åµ¶ ȯÀÚ´Â »ý°¢º¸´Ù ¸¹½À´Ï´Ù. 2008³âÀÇ °æ¿ì 1,548¸íÀ̾ú´Ù°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù (Clin Endosc 2015;48:256). AIDS·Î ÀÎÇØ ´Ù¸¥ ¼ºº´ÀÌ ¹«½ÃµÇ°í Àֱ⠶§¹®ÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤µË´Ï´Ù.


1. À§¸Åµ¶ÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû Ư¡

Gastric syphilisÀÇ Æ¯Â¡À» Á¤¸®ÇÏ¸é ¾Æ·¡¿Í °°½À´Ï´Ù.

1. Secondary and tertiary stage

2. Incidence in syphilis; <1%

3. Endoscopy; erosive gastritis or gastric ulcer with heaped, nodular edges or thickened, edematous rugal folds.

4. Histopathologic findings; suggestive, but not diagnostic


2. À§¸Åµ¶ÀÇ ³»½Ã°æ ¼Ò°ß

Á¦°¡ Áö±Ý±îÁö ¾Ë°í ÀÖ´Â gastric syphilis 6¿¹ÀÇ »çÁøÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ù¹ø° Áõ·Ê´Â º¸¸¸ 4Çü ÁøÇ༺ À§¾Ï°ú ºñ½ÁÇÏ´Ù°í ÀǷڵǾú´ø °æ¿ìÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

(2015)

2020-2-1. ºÎ»ê°æ³²Áöȸ ½ÉÆ÷Áö¾ö. ÁÁÀº»ï¼ºº´¿ø ÀÌÅ¿µ


3. CPC case: gastric syphilis

History: A 25-year-old, apparently healthy man presented with one month history of epigastric tenderness and vomiting. The patient visited a local clinic where he underwent an endoscopic examination and the endoscopic diagnosis was benign gastric ulcer. But gastric ulcer symptom was not improved on ulcer medication. He was transferred to our hospital for further evaluation. His family history and past medical history were negative for any gastrointestinal disease, abdominal surgery or significant medical illness. Physical examinations were normal except minimal epigastric tenderness only. A laboratory evaluation revealed hemoglobin of 16.4 g/dL and hematocrit 47.9%. White blood cell count and differential count were within normal ranges. Total serum protein level was 7.3 g/dL and albumin level 4.3 g/dL. Serum bilirubin and liver enzymes were within normal ranges. A computed tomographic scan of the abdomen with contrast revealed diffuse layered thickening of the wall of the gastric antrum, pylorus, duodenal bulb, and second portion of duodenal loop without definite perigastric and periduodenal fatty infiltration (Fig. 1). Multiple small and enlarged lymph nodes were identified along both common femoral vessel and inguinal area. Gastric endoscopy showed geographic irregular ulcer and shallow depressed mucosal lesions in almost all aspect of the antrum. The ulcer revealed an irregular edge and uneven nodular base (Fig. 2). Endoscope was failed to advance to the duodenal bulb due to luminal obstruction. A diagnostic procedure was done.

Biopsy: Chronic gastritis, active, with intestinal metaplasia (incomplete type), large lymphoid follicle and dense lymphoplasma cell infiltration ( Note: Based on histology, syphilitic gastritis could be considered)

Layered wall thickening involving gastric antrum, pylorus, duodenal bulb,and 2nd duodenal loop

Automated Quantitative RPR Test: Reactive(5.00)

Automated Quantitative TPLA Test: Reactive(282.9)

A: foveolar pit ¿¡¼­ H.pylori °¡ °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù. B: ½ÉÇÑ À§¿°¼Ò°ßÀ¸·Î neutrophilic infiltration ÀÌ °üÂûµÈ´Ù. C: lamina propria ¿¡ ½ÉÇÑ lymphoplasma cell infiltration ÀÌ °üÂûµÈ´Ù. D: lagre irregular lymphoid follicular hyperplasia with geographic feature

Large irregular lymphoid follicle : H.pylori °¨¿°°ú´Â ´Þ¸® marginal zone Àº »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î À§ÃàµÇ¾î ÀÖÀ¸³ª follicular center °¡ ½ÉÇÏ°Ô ´Ã¾î³ª¸é¼­ Áöµµ¸ð¾ç(geographic feature) À¸·Î Ä¿Á®ÀÖ´Ù.

CPC¿¡¼­ ³íÀǵǾú´ø ÀÌ È¯ÀÚ´Â Áõ·Êº¸°í¸¦ ÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù (À§¿Í ½ÊÀÌÁöÀåÀ» ħ¹üÇÑ ¸Åµ¶ 1¿¹).


4. More cases of gastric syphilis


½ÅÁõÈıºÀ» µ¿¹ÝÇÑ À§¸Åµ¶ (Clin Endosc 2015). Gastroscopic findings. Multiple irregular, shallow ulcers covered with whitish exudates and central depression in the (A) antrum, (B) body, and (C) cardia. Histologic findings of gastric biopsy. (A) Marked severe inflammation with lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates (H&E stain, ¡¿400). (B) Numerous spirochetes are present between foveolar epithelial cells (Warthin-Starry stain, ¡¿1,000).

Á¦82ȸ ³»½Ã°æÇÐȸ Áý´ãȸ Áõ·Ê (2008)

Á¦82ȸ ³»½Ã°æÇÐȸ Áý´ãȸ Áõ·Ê (2008)

°Ç±¹´ë ³»½Ã°æ ÄûÁî (2021)


5. Rectal syphilis

41¼¼ ·¯½Ã¾Æ ±¹Àû ³²¼ºÀÇ ´ëÀå³»½Ã°æ¿¡¼­ ¹ß°ßµÈ Á÷Àå ¸Åµ¶ Áõ·Ê¸¦ ¼Ò°³ÇÕ´Ï´Ù (Korean J Gastroenterol 2016).

Korean J Gastroenterol 2016

³í¹®¿¡ ¾ð±ÞµÈ º´·Â°ú °Ë»ç ¼Ò°ßÀ» ¿Å±é´Ï´Ù.

"³»¿ø ÇÑ ´Þ Àü Ç×¹® ¼º±³¸¦ ÇÑ °æÇèÀÌ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç ³»¿ø 2ÁÖ Àü¿¡ Ç×¹® ÁÖº¯¿¡ ÅëÁõÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù°í ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á÷Àå ³» ±Ë¾ç º´º¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¨º° Áø´ÜÀ» À§ÇØ Ãß°¡ °Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Ç÷û ¸Åµ¶±Õ ƯÀÌÇ×ü(syphilis specific Ab) °Ë»ç¿¡¼­ ¾ç¼º, ºñÆ®·¹Æ÷³×¸¶ °Ë»ç(nontreponemal test) °á°ú ¹ÝÀÀ¼º ¼Ò°ßÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. Àΰ£¸é¿ª°áÇ̹ÙÀÌ·¯½º(human immunodeficiency virus) Ç×ü ¹× Ç׿ø °Ë»ç´Â ¸ðµÎ À½¼ºÀ̾ú´Ù. Ç×¹®¿¬ »ó¹æ ºÎÀ§ÀÇ ±Ë¾ç º´º¯¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇÑ Á¶Á÷°Ë»ç °á°ú´Â ±Ë¾ç°ú À°¾ÆÁ¶Á÷À» µ¿¹ÝÇÑ Á÷Àå¿° ¼Ò°ßÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç(Fig. 3), Ãß°¡·Î ½ÃÇàÇÑ Warthin-Starry ¿°»ö¿¡¼­ ½ºÇÇ·ÎÇìŸ(Spirochaete) ¼Ò°ßÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾î ¸Åµ¶À¸·Î Áø´ÜÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(Fig. 3B). ȯÀÚ´Â ¸Åµ¶ Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇØ doxycycline º¹¿ëÀ» ½ÃÀÛÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÃßÀû °üÂûÀº ¿¬°íÁö º´¿ø¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇϱâ·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù."


[References]

1. Mylona. Gastric syphilis: a systematic review of published cases of the last 50 years. Sex Transm Dis. 2010 Mar;37(3):177-83.

The authors conducted a systematic review of the English literature for cases of Gastric Syphilis (GS) in the last 50 years. The 34 studies which met selection criteria included 52 patients with GS. Of the reviewed patients, only 13% had a history of syphilis diagnosis and 46% had prior or concurrent clinical manifestations of the disease. Epigastric pain/fullness was the most common presenting symptom (92%) and epigastric tenderness being the most common sign. Gastric bleeding of variable intensity was documented in 35% of the cases. In the radiologic examinations, fibrotic narrowing and rigidity of the gastric wall was the most common finding (43%), followed by hypertrophic and irregular folds, while in endoscopy the most common lesion types were multiple ulcerations (48%), nodular mucosa, and erosions. The antrum was the most commonly affected area (56%). The majority of the patients received penicillin (83%) with a rapid resolution of their symptoms. Seventeen percent of the patients were treated surgically either due to a complication or due to strong suspicion of infiltrating tumor or lymphoma. The nonspecific clinical, radiologic, and pathologic characteristics of GS can establish it as a great imitator of other gastric diseases. GS should be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients at risk for sexually transmitted diseases who present with abdominal complaints and unusual endoscopic lesions and no other diagnosis is made, irrespective of the presence of H. pylori. The absence of primary or secondary luetic lesions should not deter one from considering GS.

© ÀÏ¿ø³»½Ã°æ±³½Ç ¹Ù¸¥³»½Ã°æ¿¬±¸¼Ò ÀÌÁØÇà. EndoTODAY Endoscopy Learning Center. Lee Jun Haeng.